I choose to pick two interest groups who agree and disagree with miliary usage, more specific the U.S military. "Veterans For Peace" is an group who fought against the expansion of a U.S military base. On the other hand "Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs" (JINSA) is a group who favors the U.S military force.
The soul purpose of "Veterans For Peace" is not to fight of superpowers but to actually inform the public of the cost of war, not just financially but also emotionally. One thing they have achieved that I like they were able to stop the expansion of a U.S military base. By doing this, they showed that coming together can stop the world's most powerful government and military. "To restrain our governments from intervening, overtly and covertly, in the internal affairs of other nations
" This quote is straight from their statement of purpose. VFP goes against the oppression of foreign militaries. They want to be able to stand up and show peace. They show a bias against war and violence around the world . They want world peace and to abolish war. Some limitations that are can be seen are the amount of people they have and how they are spread around the world which makes it hard to come together.
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs otherwise know as JINSA have a goal to get other countries who think alike to the U.S.A with a democracy. Mainly JINSA talked about the relationship between Israel and the U.S. That is a huge party of their group. One could say a milestone for JINSA. They also pride themselves because the U.S. is one of the strongest militaries if not the strongest in the world. "Finally JINSA's mission is to provide support for a strong and robust and effective U.S. military to implement U.S. national security policy when called upon" (1:20-1:34). JINSA shows a bias to the U.S and Israel's relationship that started at the end of ww2. They favor a strong democracy government who opposes the rise of communism. Some limitations seen are they do not seem to talk about other countries. They mainly talk about the middle east and Israel. It seems this relationship is what they value the most. They do not seem to care about other relationships.
This two interest groups have some differences like their stance on the U.S. military. On one hand they dislike the aggression of the U.S military and their size. On the other hand they like the huge number of soldiers and the government. Both share the same thought that a bigger group of people the stronger you will be. One artifacts promote the spread of the U.S. military and the other talked about stopping the expansion of U.S military in foreign nations
Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs otherwise know as JINSA have a goal to get other countries who think alike to the U.S.A with a democracy. Mainly JINSA talked about the relationship between Israel and the U.S. That is a huge party of their group. One could say a milestone for JINSA. They also pride themselves because the U.S. is one of the strongest militaries if not the strongest in the world. "Finally JINSA's mission is to provide support for a strong and robust and effective U.S. military to implement U.S. national security policy when called upon" (1:20-1:34). JINSA shows a bias to the U.S and Israel's relationship that started at the end of ww2. They favor a strong democracy government who opposes the rise of communism. Some limitations seen are they do not seem to talk about other countries. They mainly talk about the middle east and Israel. It seems this relationship is what they value the most. They do not seem to care about other relationships.
Comments